AI has officially made its way into nearly every conversation in life sciences, and quality is no exception.
But while the potential of AI is exciting, Quality teams (thankfully) remain focused on a risk based approach to adopting new technologies that may compromise IP or cause regulatory problems downstream.
In a recent survey we conducted with 100 quality leaders, only 10% said they’re currently using AI in their workflows, while roughly 50% said they’re open to it if it’s the right tooling, with the right controls, in the right context.
And this makes sense! The questions Quality teams have about AI are valid. What happens to your data? How do you validate AI-powered software? Are you creating more risk than you’re preventing?
It’s these concerns – and the drive to mollify them – that has defined our approach to AI at ZenQMS: compliant AI that is simple, safe, optional, and validated.
In short, as stewards of your data and GxP quality records, we’re focused on integrating AI into our platform in a way that balances innovation and control, efficiency and compliance. Keep reading to see exactly what this means for your workflows.
In an industry where speed is critical, R&D is still too slow.
A lot of the bottleneck isn’t just science. It’s process.
Clinical phases can stretch for years and consume as much as 70% of R&D budgets. And compliance gaps are part of the delay. In fact, many FDA findings still center on things like:
That’s where AI-supported quality management can help by identifying and eliminating friction. For example:
But in a regulated environment, compliance trumps all. That’s why ZenQMS is taking a controlled approach to AI.
As we continue to develop compliant AI-powered features within ZenQMS, we’re sticking to some non-negotiable principles:
AI in ZenQMS is opt-in, not switched on by default.
Quality professionals aren’t replaceable and never will be. Every AI interaction is designed to be used in tandem with human oversight. AI suggests; humans review, accept, or edit.
Quality professionals aren’t replaceable and never will be. Every AI interaction is designed to be used in tandem with human oversight. AI suggests; humans review, accept, or edit.
Every AI transaction is:
If an auditor asks, “How did this question get here? What was contributed by AI versus edited by humans?” you have clear answers.
We’re aligning AI features with the same lean, risk-based validation approach you already use for ZenQMS:
We’re starting where impact is high and risk is minimal: automating the tediousness of quality upkeep.
When you need a specific document for compliance, you need it now. But in growing organizations with multiple product lines, sites, and versions, the time spent searching can add up. In fact, according to a recent survey of Quality professionals we conducted, it takes teams relying on manual quality management anywhere from 5 to 34 minutes to locate a document.
Here’s how the ZenQMS AI Smart Search makes a difference:
A few important nuances:
From a compliance lens, this matters. You’re using AI to get to the right filtered view faster, then applying your own expert, human judgment.
Soon, we’ll be launching AI-assisted training question generation for your SOPs and other documents. With this feature:
Behind the scenes, ZenQMS logs:
That’s real time saved and better content training coverage, all while retaining full control and traceability.
We’re building our AI roadmap around three core pillars:
Future AI capabilities in ZenQMS are aimed at helping organizations better create, understand, and evolve their documentation, gain clearer insight into changes and expectations, and surface potential risks earlier – all while keeping human control at the center.
If you’re interested in learning more about our approach to compliant AI, the current AI-powered features available for users, and the AI capabilities on the horizon, just reach out!